1. Heroism in vain

    Photobucket

    [Before I go on my tangent about soldiers and heroes, I just want to make a note regarding this specific cartoon: If that soldier really believed that he was fighting to protect Kevin’s right not to stand for the pledge, then that soldier (AND the teacher) should both have absolutely NO problem with Kevin choosing not to stand. What is the point of losing your ability to walk to protect Kevin’s right to choose, if you don’t actually want Kevin to choose? This cartoon is the height of hypocrisy.]

    Soldiers go to war to defend their country. At least, this is what is in the heart of most soldiers, and it is that heartfelt belief that makes them heroes.

    The unfortunate truth however, is that they’re not really defending their country so much as the agendas of the large corporations and political interests that rarely, if ever, are shared with the soldiers.

    So they go, they lose limbs and they die, believing that they are protecting their country from dangers that in reality are negligible compared to what they’ve been made to sound like by those who only want war and don’t care who’s sons and daughters they have to kill to get what they want.

    Cartoons like this one strike a nerve in me. Not only because I truly feel for those soldiers and their families, and the true altruism that the human spirit is proven capable of every time a soldier jumps on a grenade to protect his comrades, but because I know that they are dying in vain.

    Of course, that’s just my humble opinion.

  2. A Rant on References

    What the hell is it with employers always wanting three references? This is a logistically ridiculous practice, especially for those of us who tend to stay in one job for years at a time rather than hopping from job to job over a relatively short period. Granted, given the privacy laws that surround one’s Social Insurance Number, references are the only way for a potential employer to confirm that you haven’t lied on your resume, but let’s be realistic here: We all know that whether or not you actually worked where you said you worked is never the only question a potential employer wants to ask.

    Issue #1: There’s no one left at your previous employer who actually knows you.

    Most jobs are either general labour, retail or service based and in these professions it is common for employee and management turnover to be high. If you worked at a retail store six years ago, chances are there is absolutely no one at that store now who has any idea who you are or what your work ethic was like. You could give a potential employer the ‘home office’ phone number, but they’ll be lucky if home office can even find a file on you with the disorganized way most retail and general labour facilities are run, (and even luckier if the receptionist doesn’t just pretend to look for your file and then claim to be unable to find it). Even if home office can find a file on you, all they will be able to do is confirm that you did indeed work there, and possibly whether or not you are considered re-hireable, which only covers about 10% of what your potential employer actually wants to know about you.

    Issue #2: It should be ILLEGAL for a previous employer to say ANYTHING about you, other than confirming or denying that you worked for them at the time you claimed to have worked for them and whether or not you are considered to be re-hireable.

    Why? Because it opens them up to litigation. If they say anything bad about you, they’d better be prepared to back it up with proper documentation that includes your signature. Also, given the nature of human beings, one ex-manager’s personal opinion of you could easily colour the reference they give, potentially making you sound like either the best employee that ever existed or, yikes, a manager’s worst nightmare. Remember, just because talking smack could open a company up to litigation doesn’t mean that most managers know this or believe that you have any way of proving that they spoke negatively of you. In fact, in the areas of general labour and especially in retail and the public service industry, most managers are simply people who started as part-time associates that worked their way up and have little to no actual relevant post-secondary education. In at least half of those cases, the manager probably wouldn’t even know what the words ‘litigation’ or ‘libel’ mean.

    Solution? Retraining. References to ensure people do not lie on their resumes are still necessary, but the hiring managers of the world need a complete retraining to be made to understand that what they want is NOT the name and number of your previous manager, but the number for your previous Human Resources office who will be able to access your file and a copy of your R.O.E. They need to be made to understand that they can ask two questions, and two questions ONLY: Did “J. Doe” work as a _________ for your company between this date and that date?” And “is he/she considered to be re-hireable?”

    Period.

    P.S. Of course, if you’re anything like me then you’d still be screwed because the last company I worked for has gone bankrupt, leaving a 4-year black hole in my references.  This has forced me to use the three previous jobs before that which go back so many years that I suspect it would take an archaeologist to dig them up.

  3. "And then Jack chopped down what was the world’s last beanstalk, adding murder and ecological terrorism to the theft, enticement and trespass charges already mentioned, and all the giant’s children didn’t have a daddy any more. But he got away with it and lived happily ever after without so much as a guilty twinge about what he had done. Which proves that you can be excused just about anything if you’re a hero, because no-one asks inconvenient questions."
    - The Hogfather by Terry Pratchett (via xoxacocl)
  4. "If classes and individuals exist that are deprived of the means of production and therefore dependent on others with a monopoly over those means, the so-called democratic system can only be a lie, and one which serves to deceive the mass of the people and keep them docile with an outward show of sovereignty, while the rule of the privileged and dominant class is in fact salvaged and consolidated."
    Errico Malatesta (via domesticterrorism)
  5. Socialism: Possibly the Dirtiest Word of All

    I just don’t get it. Maybe I’m insane, but it just makes no sense to me.

    A Capitalistic Free-Market economy is not sustainable. It has proven itself to be volotile and uncontrollably dangerous more times than it has proven itself to be worthwhile. In a Capitalistic economy, the minority get all the money, and the majority work themselves to death in order to give it to them. I’m sorry, but a Democracy is supposed to be For the People, By the People, so as far as I’m concerned Capitalism is more dangerous to Demoncracy than Socialism is, for Capitalism leaves out the most important aspect: The People.

    Why is Socialism such a bad word, anyway? Sure, Socialism alone has the potential to lead to bad things, but only when it’s left in the hands of power-hungry dictators, (like capitalistic CEOs for example).  Capitalism also has the same potential (oh wait, it’s not potential, it’s REALITY.  Capitalism IS facism with a prettier face), but what’s so wrong with the idea of a Democratic Socialism? Canada has mixed a little Socialism into our Deomcracy-Soup, and the result is an un-arguably more paletable economy than almost any other in the world at the moment. I may live paycheque to paycheque, but if I fall and break my ankle, it’s not going to bankrupt me… Nor should it. We don’t have a facist dictator with a secret police stealing people from their beds at night (Which is a lame argument I’ve heard against Socialism… that somehow it will ALWAYS lead to facism and rob people of their freedoms… To which I reply: Bullshit).  Democratic Socialism does not lead to Communism, or Facism. Capitalism DOES.  We are under the thumbs of heartless dictators who are stealing our rights away right out from under our noses, and they are hiding what they are behind expensive suits and Wallstreet money. 

    Don’t get me wrong, Canada’s Socialistic Democracy is very far from perfect.  We still have WAY too much capitalism and WAY too many morons who still believe in the free market even though it’s failed time and again and is SOLELY responsible for nearly bankrupting the fucking planet.

    Capitalism makes people evil. Okay, maybe evil is a little subjective, but no one can argue the fact that the very wealthy CEOs and top execs of very wealthy companies have tunnel vision for money and have lost the ability to see the humanity in people and in themselves.  They don’t see themselves as being ‘of the people’ they see themselves as being ‘above the people’. They look at people and see dollar signs, and what they can get OUT of people rather than what they can do to make the lives of those people better. Which is techically their JOB, but who cares, right? Capitalism makes politicians say to themselves things like “What do I need to say and do to make the common labourer perceive me as their friend?”, where they should be saying to themselves “What can I do to make the lives of the common labourers better, for it is on their backs that this country is carried and it is THEIR blood, THEIR sweat and THEIR tears from which I have harvested my wealth”.

    Anyone who would defend Capitalism is someone who has lost the connection to their own humanity. Anyone who would defend Capitalism needs to spend a year living on minimum wage, trying to feed a family and keep a roof over-head. You need to see people, to be able to consider yourself one of them, and you have be one of them in order to have any authority over them and their wages.

    The way it currently works is just not fair. Evil may be a subjective word, but it fits perfectly none-the-less.

    ~MissTreats

  6. macabremarilyn:

This is the cutest bit of wisdom. Adorable. 

 happiness is a choice, for sure… I love this!

    macabremarilyn:

    This is the cutest bit of wisdom. Adorable. 

     happiness is a choice, for sure… I love this!

  7. Weight vs. Self-Esteem

    They say that your appearance shouldn’t affect your self esteem, but let’s face it: Appearance affects almost everyone’s self esteem.  What many people don’t realize, however, is that the reverse is also true:  Your appearance is directely affected by your self-esteem. 

    Beauty is subjective.  We’ve all heard the age-old colloquialism “beauty is in the eye of the beholder”, and as I get older I become more and more aware of how true this actually is.  If you do not believe you are beautiful, you need to ask yourself “why?” and “to whom?” because your beauty is dictated entirely by your attitude about it.  What is beauty to you

    I am a plus size girl and so I am going to focus on weight vs. beauty and self-esteem here, as it is a very personal subject to me.  This is my general thesis:  Thin does not a beauty make, and fat does not automatically mean ugly.  There are plenty of thin girls out there who can’t stand their appearance, and plenty of plus size girls out there who absolutely love their look.  What I’ve come to understand in my vast 31 years on this earth is that pretty much everyone has body issues.  Who are you trying to be attractive for?  Who’s oppinion of your beauty are you taking most to heart?  Are you looking for that ever-elusive commercial beauty that you see on tv and in magazines?  Well guess what, that girl you just stared down because in your opinion she has exactly that commercial appeal that you so long for, probably doesn’t think so.  She probably looks at herself in the mirror and picks herself apart just as much as you do.

    Another very important lesson I’ve come to realize is absolutely true, despite the fact that I thought it was just altruistic lip-service when I was younger is this:  Real beauty, I mean the kind that gets you positively noticed, the kind that turns heads, is in your carriage.  The attitude you project to the world in how you carry yourself is more important than how large or small you are.  A thin girl who walks with her head down, shoulders hunched, and eyes on the sidewalk is much less likely to turn heads than a plus sized girl who walks with her head high and shoulders back.  People naturally gravitate to confindence, and recoil at self-loathing.  You might not think that walking like a depressed penguin is self-loathing, but it appears that way to others and the appearance of self-loathing is all it takes to eliminate any air of confidence you thought you had.

    And the attractiveness of confidence doesn’t stop in how you carry yourself, it’s also in how you treat yourself.  Here’s a plus-sized girl pet-peeve of mine:  Making fun of or putting down your own size.  This is a common self-defense mechanism amongst plus-size people, probably developed in early childhood as a way of protecting oneself from bullies.  The idea is that if you make fun of yourself first, it takes the power away from the bullies.  Maybe you thought it worked when you were a kid, but it really didn’t, and it’s not working now.  That apparant lack of confidence just confirms to people that your identity is your plus size, and your plus size is your identity.  Pointing it out only draws attention away from all the awesome things about you.  Why would you want to be defined by your size rather than everything else you are?  STOP IT.  Don’t put yourself down, and don’t make fun of your size (unless you’re a stand-up comedian in which case all the rules change dramatically LOL).  The only time you should be aknowleging your plus size is when you’re doing it in a positive, productive way.  Say it with pride.  I ROCK my plus size.  I, personally, identify by my attitude, my confidence, my humour, my style, and my art.  NOT by my size.


    PhotobucketPhotobucket

    What do you identify by?

  8. Love Connexion
By: MissTreats

    Love Connexion

    By: MissTreats

  9. THC Molecule - Bob Marley “emancipate yourselves from mental slavery… none but ourselves can free our minds”
By: MissTreats

    THC Molecule - Bob Marley “emancipate yourselves from mental slavery… none but ourselves can free our minds”

    By: MissTreats

  10. Abortion:

    Don’t think of it as killing babies, think of it as killing criminals.

    Children who are born to parents who don’t want them generally grow up to be losers, degenerates and criminals.  Why do we want to save these people from abortion?  Like I’ve said many times before, our world is vastly overpopulated and if we can prevent people who are not going to be any use to society from ever being born in the first place, why not?

    There is not a single person alive today about whom I can say with confidence that had he or she been aborted before birth, the world would have been worse off.  Individually, none of us are really that important to the overall survival of our species so losing some individuals before they’re ever born is not really a loss. 

    In fact, being aborted is probably the best contribution to human-kind some of these people had any chance of making.  Why take that away from them?  They can either be born, grow up to become degenerates, and impact human kind negatively both in their behaviour as well as by possibly turning around and procreating themselves, thusly continuing the cycle of uselessness, or they can die for something that actually matters:  Being aborted is the ultimate sacrifice for the overall betterment of human kind.


                        Photobucket

    I’m sure if you gave the Earth a voice for five minutes, the first thing it would say is that some us have got to go. There are simply too many of us for the Earth to sustain, and our inability to see ourselves as merely creatures in an unbalanced eco-system will eventually lead to our extinction.

    But… That’s just my humble opinion.

    ~MissTreats

  11. If You Can’t Feed a Baby, Don’t Effing Have One

    Do I feel sorry for young, new parents who live in poverty?  No.  If you couldn’t afford to feed a family, you had no business having one.  The law of the jungle is that only the strongest survive.  You don’t see all the tigers gathering around to help a lame tiger raise her young, do you?  No.  If anything, you see the other tigers watch as the lame tiger’s young are killed by other animals.  That’s life.  Human beings are frighteningly arrogant in their belief that they somehow have a right to circumvent nature’s law.  If you can’t afford to feed a family, it is not the responsibility of the rest of society to pick up the pieces and fix your mistake.  Your child deserves to go hungry for your stupidity, hopefully stopping your idiot-infected bloodline before it has a chance to grow up and also procreate.  That’s nature.  That’s life.

    And that’s just… My Humble Opinion.

    ~MissTreats

  12. MTV Doesn’t Cause Teen Pregnancy, Horny Teens Do

     A recent TMZ poll asks readers if they believe that MTV is promoting/causing the teen pregnancy “epidemic”, and the answer to that question is simply… No.  Sure, some teens might purposely get pregnant in the hopes of getting on the show and becoming famous, but the real cause of their pregnancy is the fact that their bodies are ready to procreate.  To call this an “epidemic” is to insinuate that the human drive to reproduce is somehow an “illness” that needs to be neutralized.  When a girl’s body is ready to carry a pregnancy to term, she is ready to be a mother.  The only reason these girls often do such a poor job as mothers is because we live in a society that treats teens like babies, creating an atmosphere of judgement and degradation when all they are trying to do is be human.  Perhaps if the parents of these teenagers wouldn’t have babied them so horribly, they’d have the maturity to be able to plan their pregnancies out better, and perhaps the maturity to wait until they were capable of sustaining themselves before bringing a new mouth to feed into the world.  Unfortunately, the babies come whether the mother is capable of sustaining herself or not, and that is the fault of the mother’s parents who never taught her anything about real life or personal responsibility. 

    Human beings have been having babies in their teens since the beginning of time, and it is really only within the last fifty years or so that it has become so taboo.  Just because popular opinion can change at the drop of a hat doesn’t mean that millions of years of evolved human instinct can change that quickly.  Teens get horny because their bodies are ready to procreate.  Their minds could be ready for it too if society would just stop treating them like children and start expecting them to be responsible individuals from their first period/wet-dream forward.

    But that’s just my humble opinion.

    ~MissTreats

  13. PETA - Making Money off Animal Suffering

    It was cold and windy that day in Northern Canada.  Of course, it’s almost always cold and windy during the seal hunting season.  Seal hunters, with families to feed just like deer or moose hunters, were hard at work clubbing seals.  Clubbing:  Sounds horrific, but is really no more inhumaine than shooting a deer or shoving a sharp hook through the mouth of a fish.  Less inhumaine than the fish thing, actually, considering proper clubbing technique results in the instant death of the seal where fish are forced to suffer the piercing pain of metal through their inner mouth and sometimes into their eyesocket.  PETA would have you believe that the seals don’t die instantly because they flop around on the ice after being clubbed, but that is simply a nervous reaction much like a chicken after it’s had its head cut off.

    Just like many sealhunts before it, this one was plagued by PETA activists running around condemning the hunters for their inhumanity, but the real inhumanity was in the actions of PETA’s documentary team that was out there filming.  A seal that had been clubbed incorrectly, an unfortunate but relatively rare occurrance (but no more rare than a fish hook pulling out the fish’s eyeball, or a bullet hitting a deer incorrectly leaving the animal to die suffering), was lying on the ice dying.  PETA found the seal and began using it as a photo-op, terrifying the poor dying animal into retreating into the water.  But instead of allowing the animal to die in peace and dignity, they dragged it back out of the water to continue taking pictures of the dying animal to be used in their anti-sealhunt propaganda.  When some hunters happened passed the scene they wanted to finish the seal off and put it out of its misery, but PETA wasn’t finished using the poor terrified creature and therefore did not allow the hunters near.


    Photobucket

    Now, PETA will tell you that they wanted to take the animal to get medical help in the hopes of rehabilitation but consider these facts:  For one, they knew such an injury was fatal and that getting the animal medical attention that far out in the wilderness would be next to impossible and quite futile.  Second, if they really wanted to get help for the animal, then why did they waste such prescious, possibly life-saving minutes forcing it to pose for their pictures?  Because the animal’s suffering was not their primary concern, that’s why.  Getting material for their propaganda was the primary objective, because it is through selling their photos and making t-shirts that they make their money.

    Why else would they still be selling t-shirts with pictures of baby white coat seals on them, declaring “stop the murder”?  When, in fact, the hunting of baby seals has been banned in Canada for nearly twenty years?  PETA knows this, but they still use the images of these darling little babies because they pull at people’s heart-strings, and when people’s heart-strings are pulled they are more likely to open their wallets.  Period.

    PETA is just another for-profit group that claims to be “not-for-profit”.  People who still think that the Canadian seal hunt is more cruel than any other kind of hunting can thank PETA for their misinformation.  PETA are just a bunch of bullies trying to destroy the livlihood of northern Canadians who, if they were living in the middle of the united states, would likely be hunting deer or moose without being the objects of these cruel attacks by PETA.  Or perhaps in the southern states hunting alligators for shoes and bags, peacefully under the radar.  Why?  Alligators aren’t as cute as seals, so they wouldn’t sell nearly as many t-shirts.  And even PETA knows not to attack the hunting of deer because it is such a staple of the American way of life that the fight they’d have on their hands just wouldn’t be worth it.  No money to be made there.

    That’s just my humble opinion.

    ~MissTreats

About me

Someone's gotta argue against popular opinion. Since I love to argue and play devil's advocate, I have decided to take the job.

I have mental illness, and one symptom of my illness is an ability to see and empathise with every side of any given issue. It is a curse because I literally cannot take a firm stand on anything because I believe completely contradictory ideas at the same time and with the same amount of passion. However, I have learned to treat it as a blessing because I can present, and argue for, the least popular side of just about any issue!

Likes